User talk:Goudzovski

Ivanovka

Good morning Mr Goudzovski,

I am known as Jake12341 on Wikipedia. It was my first attempt and I only did it because I am doing an open university course on networks and one of our tasks was to edit a wikipedia site. The Ivanovka site, near Ismaylli, that i edited is where i actually live at least 3 months of the year. My wife, who is Russian, is an active member of the community there, and although not very religious herself takes a strong interest in the Baptist and Molokan beliefs there.

I bow to your experience as you have been doing this for a long time. Can you tell me exactly what was wrong with everything that i put onto the site? When i said near Baku i said 215 km. It is exactly that as i drive there every weekend from March until end of November. Was it because it was not verified?

By the way i am English and have lived in Baku for 8 years. I know Birmingham very well!! If it is the UK one!

Best regards Jake 12341

PS I would like in the future to put more stuff on the Ivanovka site, but am now not so sure/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jake 12341 (talk • contribs) 03:54, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and many thanks for leaving me the message concerning Ivanovka! In fact, I am afraid you put the information into an article about a different location with a similar name. The edit I reverted is in article about in Ivanovka in Russia, an estate of Sergei Rachmaninoff (which is quite far from Baku!). I guess (though I am not sure) you referred to this İvanovka in Azerbaijan? Best regards and thanks, Goudzovski (talk) 11:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I see that you have added onto a lot of stuff pertaining to Russia, particularly my hometown, Dubna. Keep it up, it's great that someone actually contributes that which so few can add as well as you. :)

Portal:Russia

Hi there. I see that you edit Russia-related topics. Come check Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. You may even want to add these boards to your watchlist. Cheers, Ghirla ^-трёп- 17:33, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Railway termini

It's nice to see someone finally paying attention to the Russian railways in this project, but I would like to ask you a favor. Please don't start new articles on Kazansky and Yaroslavsky stations in Moscow and also about the Vitebsky and Moskovsky stations in St Pete. These four articles have been on my to-do list for ages, so I would like to start these four articles myself :) Thanks for understanding and keep up the good work, Ghirla ^-трёп- 23:59, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yevgeny Tolstikov

Thanks for the input! It's hard to find information about this guy in English, I guess you speak Russian so you could help a lot :) - FrancisTyers 12:59, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's also hard to find much info in the Russian web.... Goudzovski 13:02, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

City templates

Hi there! Thanks for all your work with the city/town templates—it's a great relief to know that I'll have to do a lot fewer of them now :)

I just wanted to ask you in which order you are completing them. I wanted to resume working on them as well, and don't want us to accidentally duplicate each other's efforts. If you could let me know, that'd be great. Thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:25, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to complete the Northwestern Federal District first. Let me use this occasion to ask you a question: why is the Category:Cities and towns under jurisdiction of Saint Petersburg is a sub-category of Category:Cities and towns in Leningrad Oblast ? Also, why is it stated that Kolpino (which is under St.Petersburg's jurisdiction) is the largest city in Leningrad Oblast (see article about Leningrad Oblast) ? To my understanding, the two categories (and the corresponding templates) should be separate. Goudzovski 07:02, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, good. I'm going to work on them alphabetically then, skipping over those in the Northwestern Federal District.

As for your second question, you are correct. Category:Cities and towns under jurisdiction of Saint Petersburg is a subcat of Category:Cities and towns in Leningrad Oblast because at the time it was the easiest way to keep track of all the mess that existed in that area. Now would be a good time to separate the two. As for Kolpino, that particular sentence was added by an anon all the way back in 2004. I guess I never got around to proofreading the article on Leningrad Oblast to note this inaccuracy. I removed the sentence about Kolpino altogether, because the "aside from St. Petersburg" part is just as misleading. Thanks for catching this; your attentiveness to details amazes me to no end. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 12:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the answer. I just created the Template:Cities and towns under jurisdiction of Saint Petersburg, and detached these ones from the ones in Leningrad Oblast. Goudzovski 12:57, 30 June 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Another template will contain the municipal settlements of SPb. Goudzovski 14:01, 30 June 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Railway terminals

Done, but that actually did not need admin priviliges. Thanks for pointing this out, though.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:31, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lake infobox

Hello, infoboxes in stubs look ugly and better be avoided, cause they create ugly image jams and make the article look slovenly! Furthermore, the information you put into your infobox is already covered in the article. So what's the point? Let's keep a shorter infobox, it's much nicer this way. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 11:31, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I see your point. Then my proposal would be to remove the infobox completely. Anyway, it dublicates the text. What's your opinion? Goudzovski 11:36, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Well, I believe the article is quite alright now. We should expand it gradually, but the current infobox is OK with me. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 11:46, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates

I added the template to many dozen articles, and I may tell you two things: a) the template I add is easier to operate (at least for me); b) the second are not always omitted, they are very useful for small settlements. Sometimes I omit seconds, then check Google Earth and see something very different from the town I wanted to find. So the seconds are actually useful. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 09:25, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mzymta

Привет! Хочу всё-таки разобраться, какая река в России из впадающих в Чёрное море самая большая? Кубань ведь впадает в Азовское море... Сами жители Адлера утверждают что всё-таки Мзымта. --Wiki 13:45, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my mistake... I have reverted my correction to the article. Thanks. Goudzovski 06:31, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arkhangelsk Oblast

Hi I have recently set up the Template:Arkhangelsk Oblast which includes the district raions, cities and towns in Arkhangelsk. I then realised you have created one for cities and towns. Please could you move the template on the cities Template:Cities and towns in Arkhangelsk Oblast to the covering Oblast one and add the coat of arms from yours onto mine. I think its best if we have a template that covers locations in the oblast. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 13:18, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see User talk:Ernst Stavro Blofeld#Arkhangelsk Oblast for my response to Ernst. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:04, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ezhiki, thanks for commenting on the point, I was confused about if the templates should be expanded or not... Goudzovski 06:27, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please textify your lists

Privet, I think your version of the article looks listy. This layout is an eyesore. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 08:14, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Hi! I just want to say Merry Christmas to you! Have a nice holiday time. If you don't observe this event then I hope you don't mind this greeting. :) - Darwinek 20:12, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:Kimry-Coat-of-Arms.gif, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 08:53, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Samarsky

Thanks! I don't know how I missed the fact that a sixteen-year old Chief Engineer would have been a rather weird thing in any century :)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 21:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Romanisation of Russian

Yes thank you for the information, and sorry to have stepped in where I didn't know so much. The problem is that I am largely influenced by the only system I hitherto knew which was for the former Yugoslav languages of Serbian, Macedonia and now Montenegrin. Out Romanised forms are clear and do not change accordingly, and so I felt that Russian was the same. Your link is very useful so thanks again. Evlekis 11:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FSU Metro Project

M

This user is a participant in the Soviet Metro wikiproject.

It's ready...please join! --Kuban Cossack 14:24, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SOVMETRO

Hi there, when the project was launched back in January, I thought you would be one of the few people who would make an active part of it. However at present the future of the project is at question due to its total lack of activity. I therefore ask that you join the project and help us to make it what we originally hoped it would become. --Kuban Cossack 10:52, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am sympathic towards the project, and will help as much as I can, however I would like to abstain from joining any projects due to lack of time to contribute substantially. Sorry about that. Goudzovski 18:42, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks II

Hi, G. Thanks for fixing my Kazavskaya:-should-have-been-Kavkazskaya moment of inadvertence :)

After a while of dealing with Russian placename lists one's head (my head) tends to get in a bit of a whirl! -- Picapica 21:02, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Birobidzhan Jewish National University/Temp

Hello Goudzovshi. I was wondering if you would have any comments on, or additional edits to Birobidzhan Jewish National University/Temp. Thanks and take care. Culturalrevival 15:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't have any comments at the moment. Thanks. Goudzovski 18:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Autonomous entities

Hi, Goudzovski! I was wondering if you would be interested to provide some input to a discussion I've been having with Untifler (starts here, continues here). We could use a fresh perspective. It's easier for Untifler when a discussion this involved is done in Russian, but feel free to comment in English if you prefer. If you are not interested, that's not a problem either. Thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:27, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Czerski

I have expanded the article, thanks for starting it. I'd just like to note that Czerski was a Pole, not a Russian (ethnicity, but a citizien of Russian Empire). Perhaps you could read over the article, see if any nameplaces need to be corrected (I relied extensively on Polish sources), and perhaps you could add some Russian language websites/sources/publications? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 19:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the impressive expansion of the article. I would like to edit it slightly paying attention to transcription of several places and names. In particular, do you know the English or Russian for Bogowieszczeńsk? Could it be Blagoveshchensk? Goudzovski 16:33, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help with transliteration. All the text states is that it was near the Amur river; I'd say its a good bet this is the place - I'd suggest replacing it but mentioning the change on talk on the off chance somebody comes up with another match.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 17:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MINOR and WP:OBVIOUS

Hello,

Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to 2007 Siberian orange snow, as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Wikipedia:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa) is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. (diff)

Please also have a look at Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles, especially the section #State the obvious, in order to avoid edits like this, which I fixed. The idea is "Don't delete, improve" (AKA "Improve, don't delete"). Thank you. — Komusou ^talk @ 20:26, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments concerning style guides. Mentioning Siberian Federal District instead of Siberia looks correct for me, though I still consider it overkill. Normally the Federal district is not specified when speaking about Federation subject (at least inside Russia). However, I consider it a minor question. Regards, Goudzovski (talk) 09:52, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This thread has been copied for centralized debate at the article's talk page, please do not further answer here but at Talk:2007 Siberian orange snow#Siberia controversy. Thanks you. — Komusou ^talk @ 15:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Romanization of Russian

Hi, Goudzovski! Since you previously expressed interest in the WP:RUS guideline, perhaps you would be interested in reviewing a re-defined Wikipedia talk:Romanization of Russian#criteria of conventionality proposal I have just submitted. I intend editors to vote on it, but any comments are, of course, also welcome. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:40, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nobel Peace Prize icon

There is a discussion ongoing at Template talk:Nobel icon about removal of the Nobel icons from the infoboxes. The overwhelming majority in the discussion appear to favor removal of these icons. Since you reverted my removal at Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, I invite you to join the discussion. Thanks! --Clubjuggle ^T/C 22:21, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Stations-metro-spb.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Stations-metro-spb.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:34, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For the article on Vladimir Veklser. Was just reading about a "professor Veksler" who put thick film emulsion films on the R-1A rocket for cosmic ray experiments. DonPMitchell (talk) 19:34, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there

Hello, I saw your graph of the number of stations in Saint Petersburg. There is one metro station fewer currently in Saint Petersburg (since last week), closed for more than one year.--213.159.118.174 (talk) 06:48, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for info, I'll check and possibly improve the plot. Goudzovski (talk) 10:14, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the official source for this info : http://www.metro.spb.ru/27.html&new_id=121 --213.159.118.174 (talk) 07:22, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An Invite to join Arctic WikiProject

Hi, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Arctic WikiProject! The Arctic WikiProject is a fairly new WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, and Wikiprojects, to do with anything Arctic.

As you have shown an interest in North Pole-1 we thought you might like to take an interest in this growing WikiProject.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project! SriMesh | talk 01:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stations-metro-spb.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stations-metro-spb.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:57, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Isaak Russman

An article that you have been involved in editing, Isaak Russman, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaak Russman. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. We definitely need someone who understands Russian to make this decision. --CronopioFlotante (talk) 17:25, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source for this edit?

[1]

It's really important to add them as we go otherwise the list will become unmanageable. Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 15:10, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hi there! I've just granted you a rollbacker right; thought you might find it handy :) Plus, I see no reason why not. Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); February 25, 2010; 14:22 (UTC)

Many thanks! I hope that will improve my efficiency. Goudzovski (talk) 14:23, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Hi there! When adding infoboxes (such as the one you just did in Staraya Russa), could you please use the set of parameters documented in {{Infobox Russian inhabited locality}}? The old parameters do still work, but they have been deprecated, and another user was kind enough to agree to go through all existing articles and have the deprecated parameters replaced. Using current parameters right from the start will mean less work for him. Thanks much!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); April 12, 2010; 15:10 (UTC)

Sure, thanks for pointing out where the documentation is! Goudzovski (talk) 15:12, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pavlovsk

Hi there! I changed the Pavlovsk page to what it was before, because it is not a disambig page (it's a set index). I also moved Mariupol mention into the hatnote, but I wanted to point out that the article about Mariupol does not mention Pavlovsk. That's something that needs to be fixed. Also, if there are any more places in Ukraine called "Pavlovsk", then the current Pavlovsk page will need to be moved to "Pavlovsk, Russia" as is, and a disambig page will need to be created at "Pavlovsk" proper. Hope it makes sense. If not, please let me know. Thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); May 3, 2010; 16:53 (UTC)

{{otheruses3}} -> {[tl|about}}{{otheruses}}

Please do not use {{otheruses3}}. It redirects to ~~{[tl|about}}~~{{otheruses}}.174.3.123.220 (talk) 09:04, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moscow Metro

I have reverted your reinsertion of those sections in the article. They are unsourced and the list of ground sections is completely unreadable and confusing. Apart from the list, you are welcome to reinstate other sections but only if sources are provided. I tried to but failed, unfortunately. The article must reach GA status no matter what so the ill-fated parts should be sacrificed. Artem Karimov (talk | edits) 10:55, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Troitse-Lykovo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Troitse-Lykovo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troitse-Lykovo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Artem Karimov (talk) 17:09, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alma-Atinskaya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alma-Atinskaya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alma-Atinskaya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Artem Karimov (talk) 01:09, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

St-Léonard listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect St-Léonard. Since you had some involvement with the St-Léonard redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Thryduulf (talk) 19:46, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

West Midlands Police Museum editathon

Hi, I see you;re in Birmingham. You may be interested in this event. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ivanenko Sokolov details

Hello Mr Goudzovski! I've noticed you are a particle physicist. I have encountered recently in the classical book (1951) Atomic Physics by Eduard Shpolsky a mention of Dmitry Ivanenko and Arseny Sokolov analysis on the issue of the radius of the electron. I therefore ask if you could acces the mentioned book Classical field theory by Ivanenko and Sokolov and add some details to electron article. Thanks.--193.231.19.53 (talk) 10:50, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CKM brainfart

Thanks for catching this mistake I made. I had a brainfart there. Theta_13 isn't even the analog of the Cabibbo angle. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 15:22, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Goudzovski. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Goudzovski. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Goudzovski. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Time contraction" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Time contraction. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 18#Time contraction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DVdm (talk) 23:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

LEGEND (experiment) moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating LEGEND (experiment). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:29, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:LEGEND (experiment)

Hello, Goudzovski. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:LEGEND (experiment), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:57, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:LEGEND (experiment)

Hello, Goudzovski. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "LEGEND".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]